Publications
January 2024 Centralized Screening Monitoring Team Case Blocks
2024-03-26 09:30:11
During January 2024, the OIG’s Centralized Screening Monitoring Team randomly selected 645 grievances for monitoring. This document presents 10 notable cases monitored and closed by the OIG during January 2024.
March 2024 Intake Unit Impact Case Blocks
2024-03-25 16:10:04
As part of our statute, the Office of the Inspector General (the OIG) maintains an Intake Processing Unit, which receives complaints from the incarcerated population and the public, in communication with our office. Intake staff respond to these communications, which can exceed 650 complaints each month. Complaints arrive to us through regular mail, by phone calls (toll-free hotline), and as web inquiries received via our website. This file includes 10 complaints for which our Intake staff conducted a review or inquiry and have closed as of February 2024. These cases highlight a variety of matters in which the actions of OIG staff had an impact on the complainant and may result in further OIG monitoring of inquiries or investigations conducted by departmental staff.
2023 OIG Annual Report
2024-03-12 09:40:31
This annual report summarizes the work the Office of the Inspector General completed during 2023, including the 16 public reports we issued. The report also details the work the OIG performed that was not highlighted in other reports issued during the year.
13th Blueprint Monitoring Report
2024-03-11 07:52:59
This report evaluates the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s progress meeting the components of its 2012 Blueprint plan that it had not previously met, focusing on a review of standardized staffing of rehabilitative programs. This 13th report presents data collected between November and December 2023, with the exception of departmental population figures, which extend through June 30, 2023.
January 2024 Local Inquiry Team Retrospective Reviews
2024-02-26 17:04:13
During the January 2024 review period, the OIG’s Local
Inquiry Team retrospectively reviewed two random local
inquiry cases that were closed by the department in June 2023
and September 2023, respectively, in order to assess
the department’s performance on local inquiry cases that our
office did not contemporaneously monitor.
January 2024 Local Inquiry Team Case Blocks
2024-02-26 17:03:30
From January 1, 2024, through January 31, 2024, the OIG’s Local
Inquiry Team monitored and closed four cases. This document
presents all monitored and closed cases during this period.
December 2023 Centralized Screening Monitoring Team Case Blocks
2024-02-07 13:42:09
During December 2023, the OIG’s Centralized Screening Monitoring Team randomly selected 556 grievances for monitoring. This document presents 12 notable cases monitored and closed by the OIG during December 2023.
December 2023 Local Inquiry Team Case Blocks
2024-02-05 14:31:21
From December 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023, the OIG’s
Local Inquiry Team monitored and closed five cases. This document
presents all monitored and closed cases during this period.
December 2023 Local Inquiry Team Retrospective Reviews
2024-02-05 14:29:51
During the December 2023 review period, the OIG’s Local Inquiry Team retrospectively reviewed 18 random local inquiry cases that were closed by the department from June through September 2023, in order to assess the department’s performance on local inquiry cases that our office did not contemporaneously monitor.
Special Review: The Department Violated Its Regulations by Redirecting Backlogged Allegations of Staff Misconduct to Be Processed as Routine Grievances
2024-01-29 10:00:07
In this special review, we shed light on the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s decision to address a backlog of incarcerated persons’ allegations of staff misconduct by converting them into routine grievances and sending them to local prison staff for handling instead of performing an investigation or inquiry. The decision violated both the department’s regulations and its policy for screening and investigating grievances received from incarcerated people who alleged staff misconduct. Our review found that the department’s decision to redirect these grievances to its prisons circumvented control measures that were put in place to prevent prison authorities from making potentially biased decisions when responding to allegations of staff misconduct.